12 March 2018 - Does buyers’ dependence translate into financial performance? An empirical analysis of manufacturer-service provider relationships - Ornella Benedettini
In this Webinar Ornella Benedettini discusses her Alliance paper titled: 'Does buyers’ dependence translate into financial performance? An empirical analysis of manufacturer-service provider relationships'. It may be beyond the capabilities of individual firms, or not be economically viable, to provide directly all the services related to a core product. For example, manufacturers of capital equipment often decide to supply services to certain customers/markets themselves, while also enabling distributors or other intermediaries to plan, install, integrate, support, optimise the product for the customer and provide product-related training. In such instances, the question arises of how should the manufacturer structure the ensuing supplier-buyer relationship with third-party providers of product-related services.
Please allow social and marketing cookies to show embedded content.
Drawing upon supply chain management (SCM) research and the theoretical lens of relational embeddedness, this study investigates the effects of a service provider’s “dependency” on a manufacturer’s financial performance in supplier-buyer relationships involving a servitized manufacturer and a third-party provider of product-related services. Using financial-statement-based data from 190 servitized manufacturer-service provider relationships, we find that a service provider’s dependency increases the manufacturer’s performance in terms of return-on-assets (ROA), return-on-sales (ROS) and asset turnover (ATO). However, as service provider dependency increases, the manufacturer experiences diminishing returns; as dependency increases beyond a certain, the negative outcomes offset benefits. Thus, overall, the study finds evidence of an inverted U-shaped relationship between a service provider’s dependency and a manufacturer’s financial performance.