skip to primary navigationskip to content

Cambridge Service Alliance

At the forefront of service transformation in the digital era

Studying at Cambridge

 

Why Do Servitized Firms Fail - A Risk-Based Expanation

last modified Dec 16, 2015 11:11 AM
The December paper 'Why Do Servitized Firms Fail - A Risk-Based Explanation' by Ornella Benedettini, Andy Neely and Morgan Swink
Why Do Servitized Firms Fail - A Risk-Based Expanation

December 2015 Paper

'Why Do Servitized Firms Fail? A Risk-Based Explanation’

Ornella Benedettini, Andy Neely, Morgan Swink

A major challenge for product manufacturers that move towards service provision is to understand  the attendant risk consequences in order to manage them appropriately. In this paper, we build on the distinction between ‘environmental’ and ‘internal’ risks (i.e. risks that arise from the business landscape or from decisions made by the company’s management) to investigate how these categories affect the impact of service provision on companies’ risk profiles.

In particular, we concentrate on the risks that may cause product firms to fail in the most extreme sense, those that may lead to bankruptcy. Using data from a sample of 75 servitized and 54 non-servitized bankrupted manufacturers, we find that the presence of a service business increases overall bankruptcy risks for the supplying firm. This is essentially because of greater internal risks, indicating that management abilities have a significant potential for controlling the risk consequences of service transitions. At the same time, environmental bankruptcy risks do not decrease under servitization.

We propose that, although servitization may help firms to secure their market position and achieve customer-centric value, the concomitant exposure to greater demand volatilities, to different customer needs, and to the uncertainties of more operating theatres tends to cancel the potential reduction of environmental risks. Nevertheless, we find that the type of services offered has an influence on the relationship between servitization and bankruptcy risks. Because they require limited technological knowhow, ‘demand chain’ services (i.e. retail and distribution, financial services) are attractive for manufacturing firms in search of new revenue opportunities. However, our findings suggest that firms focusing these services are also exposed to greater environmental bankruptcy risks than other servitized and non-servitized firms. Managers should therefore carefully consider focusing on these services because they also amplify uncertainties and risks associated with the product business.

[paper]

RSS Feed Latest news

'Using AI to Track How Customers Feel — In Real Time' published in the Harvard Business Review

May 13, 2021

The paper 'Using AI to Track How Customers Feel — In Real Time' by Mohamed Zaki, Janet R. McColl-Kennedy and Andy Neely has been published in Harvard Business Review.

Industry Day 2020 | What we learnt

Dec 06, 2020

What is the future of services in the new pandemic-driven era? This was the topic explored at our 2020 Industry Day by senior executives from L'Oréal, Microsoft Research, Manchester United and start-up, Fairjungle.

Understanding business models in the construction sector

Nov 25, 2020

What’s standing in the way of offsite manufacturing? For decades, the construction sector has been hailing it as the next big thing but we have yet to see it really taking off. Why is that, when the technologies and processes already exist? Dr Zakaria Dakhli believes it is due to a fundamental incompatibility between business models and it is only when this has been fully understood that the long-awaited transformation can take place.

A machine learning approach to quality control

Nov 14, 2020

Most of the products we take for granted contain huge numbers of components assembled in multiple stages by different manufacturers. Quality control is vital throughout the assembly process with rigorous testing required at every step.

View all news